MINISTRY OF FINANCE OF UKRAINE: STATEMENT RELATING TO SUPREME COURT HEARING, 11 NOVEMBER 2021
-
About Ministry
- Recruitment
-
Accountable agencies
- State Enterprises and Institutions Belonging to the Sphere of Management of the Ministry
- State Service for Financial Monitoring
- State Treasury
- The State Audit Service of Ukraine
- State Fiscal Service
- State Tax Service
- State Customs Service
- Personnel Audit Procedures of State Customs Service
- University of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine
- Minfin Panel
-
Policy Issues
- Budget policy
- Tax Policy
-
Customs Policy
-
Customs Reform
- Common transit mode
- System of simplifications
- General declaration of arrival
- Authorized economic operators
- The only window for international trade
- Promoting the protection of intellectual property rights
- Qualification and reliability testing
- Functioning of the State Customs Service in the format of a single legal entity
-
Customs Reform
-
Accounting and Auditing
-
Accounting
- Introduction of International Financial Reporting Standards
- Accounting in Private Sector
- Accounting in the Public Sector
- Methodological Accounting Council under the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine (download a short description)
- IFRS Council under the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine (download a short description)
- Auditing
-
Accounting
- Debt policy
- Financial Policy
-
Financial Monitoring
- Statements and reports of international organizations
- Legislation
- International standards
- Methodological assistance (recommendations and explanations)
- Education, trainings and seminars
- Samples of drawing up a schematic representation of the ownership structure
- List of states (jurisdictions) that do not comply or improperly implement the recommendations of international and intergovernmental organizations involved in the field prevention and counteraction
- List of persons to whom sanctions have been applied
- List of terrorists
- Send a report on violation of the legislation in the field of prevention and counteraction to legalization (laundering) of proceeds from crime, terrorist financing and financing of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction
-
International Cooperation
- Partners
-
Cooperation in Attracting Financing from the International Financial Institutions
- Procedure for attracting funds of International Financial Institutions
- World Bank
- EBRD
- EIB
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
- KFW
- Register of Joint IFIs Projects at the Stage of Preparation and Implementation (information)
- International Technical Assistance (within the competence of the Ministry of Finance)
- Monitoring of international technical assistance projects
- Cooperation with the Development Partners
- International Tax Relations
- Development of Public Internal Financial Control (PIFC)
- Other Areas of Public Policy
- Public Finance Management Strategy (PFMS)
-
Legislation
-
Regulatory Activity
- reports_on_the_effectiveness_of_regulatory_acts_2023
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2022
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2023
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2022
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2022
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2022
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2020
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2021
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2021
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2020
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2020
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2020
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2019
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2019
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2019
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2018
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2018
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2018
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2017
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2017
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2017
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2016
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2016
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2016
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2015
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2015
-
Draft Regulatory Acts Discussion
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2023
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2022
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2021
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2020
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2019
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2018
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2017
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2016
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2015
- Draft Legislation
-
Regulatory Activity
-
Data
- Cooperation with Civil Society
- Press Center
Ukraine makes final submissions before United Kingdom Supreme Court, reinforcing its assertion that its US$3 billion Eurobonds were issued in 2013 under Russian duress.
At a hearing held today at the United Kingdom Supreme Court, Ukraine took the opportunity to present once more its legal position in relation to the claim brought against it in respect of the US$3 billion Eurobonds purportedly issued as a conventionally listed debt instrument in December 2013 but taken up as to 100% by the Russian Federation in highly exceptional circumstances.
Ukraine has always contended that, as a result of Russia’s preceding threats and acts of both economic and military aggression, it was left with no choice and ultimately coerced by Russia into entering the contracts for the bonds.
Consequently, Ukraine contends that either the bonds should be set aside by the Court for duress, with the Court conducting a full public trial into Russia’s conduct, or the legal proceedings should be stayed, as a matter of justice and fairness, if the English Court considers it cannot for reasons of its own rules proceed to hear Ukraine’s defence. This is the position which was adopted by the English Court of Appeal in its highly important decision in September 2018.
Ukraine remains confident of a positive outcome in the proceedings, which are brought as part of a broader strategy of aggression against Ukraine that continues to be waged by Russia to this day. Ukraine reaffirms its commitment to standing firm in the face of Russia’s aggression.
Following today’s hearing, it can be expected that the Supreme Court will now conclude its deliberations and proceed to give its judgment.