US open to more money for Ukraine
-
About Ministry
- Recruitment
-
Accountable agencies
- State Enterprises and Institutions Belonging to the Sphere of Management of the Ministry
- State Service for Financial Monitoring
- State Treasury
- The State Audit Service of Ukraine
- State Tax Service of Ukraine
- State Customs Service of Ukraine
- Personnel Audit Procedures of State Customs Service
- State Tax University
- Minfin Panel
-
Policy Issues
- Budget policy
- Tax Policy
-
Customs Policy
-
Integration of customs legislation into EU law
- Direct and indirect customs representation: possible scenarios for declaring goods and the role of a customs broker
- Customs representative and customs holder: who submits and signs documents
- Confirmation of the reliability of credentials for obtaining authorizations
- Authorization to carry out customs brokerage activities
- Integration of customs IT systems to MASP-C
-
Integration of customs legislation into EU law
-
Accounting and Auditing
-
Accounting
-
Introduction of International Financial Reporting Standards
- Translation of International Financial Reporting Standards 2025 (to be completed)
- Translation of international financial reporting standards of 2024
- Translation of international financial reporting standards of 2023
- Translation of the 2022 International Financial Reporting Standards and the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
- Archive of translations
- Taxonomy
- Translation of technical publications
- General Clarifications (filled in after the preparation of the relevant letters of explanation)
- Accounting in Private Sector
- Accounting in the Public Sector
- Methodological Accounting Council under the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine (download a short description)
- IFRS Council under the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine (download a short description)
-
Introduction of International Financial Reporting Standards
- Auditing
- Sustainability reporting
-
Accounting
-
Debt policy
- Overview
- Debt News
- Debt Statistics
- Domestic Bonds
- Primary Dealers
- Eurobonds
- Credit Rating
- Investor Relations
- DMO Awards
- Anti-money laundering policy (AML)
- Financial Policy
- National revenue strategy
-
International Cooperation
- Partners
-
Cooperation in Attracting Financing from the International Financial Institutions
- Development Bank of the Council of Europe
- Procedure for attracting funds of International Financial Institutions
- World Bank
- EBRD
- EIB
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH
- KFW
- Register of Joint IFIs Projects at the Stage of Preparation and Implementation (information)
- International Technical Assistance (within the competence of the Ministry of Finance)
- Monitoring of international technical assistance projects
- Cooperation with the Development Partners
- International Tax Relations
- Development of Public Internal Financial Control (PIFC)
-
Public investment management
- Regulatory documents
- Implementation of the roadmap for reforming the management of public investments
- Unified portfolio of public investment projects (list of priority public investment projects)
- Interdepartmental working group on reforming the public investment management system
- Reference information
-
Other Areas of Public Policy
- Internal Audit
- Audit Committee of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine
- Scientific and scientific and technical activity
- Reform Support Team at the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine
- Verification of State Social Payments
-
Fiscal Risks Managament
- Clarifications
- Legislation on Fiscal Risks Management
- List of Economic Entities with which Major Fiscal Risks May Be Related
- Reports
- List of business entities to which the Ministry of Finance approves proposals for individual financial indicators for the planning period, as well as proposals for maximum thresholds for the volume of capital investments
- Operations with precious stones and metals
- Licensing
- Public Finance Management Strategy (PFMS)
- Strategic Plan
-
Legislation
-
Regulatory Activity
- Reports on tracking the effectiveness of regulatory acts in 2025.
- Activity plan of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine for project preparation regulatory acts in 2025
- reports_on_the_effectiveness_of_regulatory_acts_2024
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2024
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2024
- reports_on_the_effectiveness_of_regulatory_acts_2023
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2022
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2023
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2022
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2022
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2022
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2020
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2021
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2021
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2020
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2020
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2020
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2019
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2019
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2019
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2018
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2018
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2018
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2017
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2017
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2017
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2016
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2016
- Schedule of measures to monitor the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2016
- Reports on the effectiveness of regulatory acts 2015
- The activity plan for the preparation of the regulatory acts draft 2015
-
Draft Regulatory Acts Discussion
- Draft regulatory acts for discussion in 2025.
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2024
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2023
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2022
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2021
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2020
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2019
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2018
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2017
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2016
- Regulatory acts draft for discussion 2015
- Draft Legislation
-
Regulatory Activity
-
Data
- Cooperation with Civil Society
- Press Center
The US has opened the door to increasing its financial assistance for Ukraine, on the eve of a vote in the Kiev parliament over an $18bn debt restructuring that has drawn criticism from some creditors and opposition politicians.
The debt deal secured in August after months of negotiations and scheduled to be voted on on Thursday is a crucial component of a four-year $40bn plan to fill the financing gaps in Ukraine brought on by the economic collapse that has accompanied the conflict in the country’s east.
But Ukraine’s government, facing growing opposition at home, has for months insisted that it needs additional help from the international community, as it battles Russian-backed rebels in its eastern provinces and tries to push through tough economic reforms mandated by the IMF.
The US contribution so far has come in the form of two $1bn loan guarantees this year. In recent weeks Washington has begun to hint it would be open to a third that would come as part of a broader package of additional financing from Europe and other sources.
Jack Lew, Treasury secretary, mentioned the possibility of a third loan guarantee to reporters on the sidelines of a G20 meeting this month, although he cautioned: “That’s a little bit over the horizon.”
“There is the prospect for additional financing from the United States and from other sources as well,” a senior US Treasury official told the Financial Times. “For Ukraine to be successful in this environment it will require support from the United States, from Europe, from other bilateral and multilateral sources.”
Mr Lew and his deputies at the US Treasury have taken an intense interest in Ukraine over the past year and invested heavily in the current government and particularly Natalie Jaresko, the finance minister who until recently called Chicago home.
This year alone Mr Lew and other senior Treasury officials have logged 30 calls or face-to-face meetings with Ms Jaresko and other top leaders in Kiev, according to Treasury records. Even amid concerns over China, a slowing global economy and recent market turmoil, Mr Lew reserved his lone dinner slot at a recent G20 finance ministers meeting in Turkey to huddle with Ms Jaresko at a seafood restaurant in what aides cite as a sign of the importance he attaches to the issue.
Ukraine “is definitely in the highest priority bin”, said Nathan Sheets, who as undersecretary for international affairs is Mr Lew’s chief deputy on matters outside the US.
Mr Sheets said the debt restructuring was the best Ukraine could have hoped for and an important element of restoring growth to its economy, which the IMF now expects to contract by 9 per cent this year. “When you come back from a negotiation it’s always easy to say oh, you could have got more. But my sense is that a deal is very much in the best interests of Ukraine and at the same time is fair to Ukraine’s creditors,” Mr Sheets said.
But this week’s vote in Kiev on the debt deal comes as the government is facing increasingly rowdy opposition from parliament, where on Tuesday it was struggling to muster enough votes to pass even uncontested legislation.
While the government remains confident it can secure parliament’s support for the debt deal, insiders say it may have to offer sweeteners such as boosts to pensions and public sector wages, either of which is likely to be unpopular at the IMF.
Robert Kahn, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington, said the Ukrainian economy still faced enormous challenges and there was a growing consensus that the international community would soon have to do more.
One more $1bn loan guarantee from the US “would be constructive”, he said. “But it is not enough.”